To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76653
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 09:35:00 +0000 2007 ------- @cmc: From a cursory first look at the various changes, I have the impression that at least some of them would benefit more from simplifying the code so that any (logically) static const data is indeed static const (and causing little or no overhead at dlopen time) instead of complicating the code with rtl::Static. I will comb through the changes, but probably not before next week. And I hope you are OK with that, after you have already invested time and effort into those changes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
