To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79368
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 09:09:52 +0000 2007 ------- Okay. Thanks. Regarding the sentinel value: My comment was not related to whether there is one or not, but how it is checked. So, instead of for (int k=0; !aTmp[k].equals(OUString()); k++) one could have written for (int k=0; aTmp[k].getLength() > 0; k++) and would have saved creating an empty string instance. However, with the new patch, this will change anyway. And I agree, that there should be a sentinel value. Hard coding the array size or calculating it is not reasonable. Sorry that my comment was not clear in that regard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
