To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85149
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 23:37:17 +0000 2008 ------- Oh boy....after looking at the list I see we're probably missing a LOT of distros which supply OOo. I'm also not sure about this comment and how it relates to what's written on this page. For example, I have an old 2.0 version on my SuSE 10.0 at home which clearly says it's a "Novell" version, but my newer 10.3 at work just seems to be plain vanilla 2.2 but simply included in the opensuse packages. So...whoever changes this perhpas needs some guidance in what this listing is actually supposed to signify. It might be simpler in the long run to just stop after the NOTE paragraph. Keeping up with all Linux distros that supply OOo will be a headache in the long run. My .02 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
