To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 23:32:07 +0000 2008 ------- Two nits in the updated spec: - The first entry under "Suggested accelerator keys" should say "OpenOffice.org", not "OpenOffice". - In section 3, "Configuration", it isn't clear which style "standard addressing" refers to. If it's OpenOffice.org A1 style, say that. Also, I'm wondering why OOo Calc has Excel and OpenOffice.org variants of A1 but only one kind of R1C1, which (based on the comment in address.hxx) seems to be the analogue of the Excel A1. I prefer R1C1 on its merits and don't care personally about consistency with Excel; thus, if there were an OpenOffice.org R1C1, I would use that. Does the lack of an OpenOffice.org R1C1 indicate that the OOo team has decided to adopt the Excel formats as recommended and just keep the OpenOffice.org A1 for OOo backward compatibility? If so, perhaps the OpenOffice.org A1 should be labeled "Classic" or even "Legacy". --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
