To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87469
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 13:52:15 +0000 2008 ------- vg: Well, "If someone is able to make changes to tests.lst, making changes to build.lst will not be a problem." is very arguable ;-) I'm able to create a new line in prj/build.lst, or do changes there to fix parallel build issues, etc. but never knew what this 'nmake' means - the only explanation I saw was in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Hacking#prj.2Fbuild.lst [mmeeks, thanks for the article! :-)] Believe me, these files grow by copy and pasting; without the example of the separate file, we'll never see the amount of unit tests growing by the community programmers. sb: Yes, if we agree that we want to go the way I proposed, I'll happily extend that. But at the moment it does not make sense anyway - as you know, we have a circular dependency sal -> testshl2 -> sal, so... Please, let's talk in patches instead of in words; please show us your version, and we can compare - without it, it is hard to see the advantages and disadvantages... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
