To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91943
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 22 13:03:31 +0000 2008 ------- well, i set it to invalid because it is a patch and i would simply don't accept the patch because we have a different mechanism that was of course not publicly known so far but works well. I still thinking that it is a correct decision to handle it more careful. Maybe i missed a potential discussion but it was definitely not on the api list. I have some backlog with other lists ;-) because of important 3.0 issues. So please don't see it personal. And as i have already communicated on [EMAIL PROTECTED] we have to find a satisfying solution. But simply integrating a whitelist without further definition is of course useless. And i am still against a whitelist. I would always prefer patching the reference rdb. If you have a concrete problem feel free to ask me how you can solve it. But this patch is invalid for me and it make no sense to keep it open. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
