To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98453
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Tue Jan 27 11:01:04 +0000 2009 ------- @hdu: one remark / question regarding the minimal kashida width implementation for UNX. The width of 0x640 is returned as the minimal kashida width. On the other hand, in GenericSalLayout::KashidaJustify() there is a tolerance of 3*nGapWidth < nKashidaWidth. In fact, the application level will drop kashida positions or fall back to blank justification, while the output can handle much smaller kashida expansions. On usp on the other hand, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the minimal kashida width and the output tolerance, which IMHO is not so desirable either. Because of that, we had to fight so much with the ugly gaps. On the other hand, for most fonts usp uses a smaller kashida glyph than the default for 0x640. So, documents will have slightly different formatting on UNX and usp. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
