To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105490
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Sun Oct 4 09:23:08 +0000 2009 ------- Hi Alan, Do you have an idea why loading UTF-8 is "much faster" than loading ISO-8859-8, when the conversion is a trivial lookup table? And why is UTF-8 the quickest, anyway - does myspell, hunspell or OpenOffice use UTF-8 as its internal representation (and not wide characters, or other possible representations)? I have another question (I can check this myself but if you have a quick answer, it can save me time) - how much larger is the UTF-8 encoded dictionary than the ISO-8859-8 dictionary? The reason I'm asking these questions is that we are preparing for a new Hspell release (a few years after our last release, unfortunately), and would like to build dictionaries that would be useful to OpenOffice, as well as other projects. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
