To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92011
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Fri Nov 27 15:48:43 +0000 2009 ------- Several users in this thread have clearly explained the compelling importance of resolving this issue to enable migration from the other office suite. 3.2 looks like it is heading for RC1 now and this issue is not in the list of open issues to be addressed in the release. I assume it is too late to be added as in issue for the 3.2 release, I understand the difficulties of adding issues this late in the release cycle. Is there an accepted way to raise the priority of this issue? By my reading of the priority descriptions this should be a P2. Since I do not understand how the priorities are determined in the open source model (I have been the product manager for large proprietary sw projects) I do not know if we have "pulled all the levers" available to us. My goal would be for it to be in a 3.2.x release rather than wait for 3.3, or ensure that it has high 3.3 priority. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
