To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
                  Issue #:|51364
                  Summary:|Memory Leak in the Mail Merge API
                Component:|Word processor
                  Version:|OOo 2.0
                 Platform:|All
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|All
                   Status:|NEW
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|DEFECT
                 Priority:|P3
             Subcomponent:|code
              Assigned to:|tl
              Reported by:|tl





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 05:23:47 -0700 
2005 -------
This is a follow-up to internal issue #120086#.

Since some of the problems have been fixed in CWS memory01 and #120086# got
fixed in CWS os65 this one is for other still remaining memory leaks.

I'll just add the comment of the original issue here:
===========================================
Kai Sommerfeld is able to reproduce the leak.
He measured with the help of the Windows Taskmanager by using example class-

Test 1
======

- Setup remote connection
- get remote component context
- determine remote service manager from the remote component context
( Mailmerge -- completely disabled )
- exit

client program run | soffice memory consumption
0 36400K
1 36680K
2 36684K
3 36684K
4 36684K
5 36684K

==> no leak

Test 2
======

- Test 1
- remote service manager creates 'css.text.MailMerge' instance
( no execution of the mailmerge functionality
-> No XJob.execute(...) )
- exit

client program run | soffice memory consumption
0 36416K
1 37224K
2 37756K
3 38216K
4 38696K
5 39188K

==> We have a problem : approx. +450K pre client

Test 3
======

- like Test 2, but instead of 'css.text.MailMerge' instance, instance
of the simple services 'css.io.Pipe' created

client program run | soffice memory consumption
0 36356K
1 36648K
2 36660K
3 36660K
4 36660K
5 36660K

==> No leak

Remote UNO should not be the problem but the implementation of 
css.text.MailMerge.
===========================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to