Perhaps the reason that 14.04 was chosen was because it was the latest LTS version. Is 16.04 labeled as LTS?
Thanks, Way From: Josh Spain [mailto:jsp...@affinegy.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 2:39 PM To: Hertel, Carrie <carrie.her...@oregonstate.edu>; Krystian Zlomek <kzlo...@affinegy.com>; Karol Matuszkiewicz <kmatuszkiew...@affinegy.com>; Jorge Martinez <jmarti...@affinegy.com>; Paul Sigurdson <psigurd...@affinegy.com>; Way Vadhanasin <wayakorn.vadhana...@microsoft.com>; Daniel Mihai <daniel.mi...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Kane <kk...@microsoft.com>; Greg Zaverucha <gr...@microsoft.com> Cc: alljoyn-core@lists.alljoyn.org; Art Lancaster <alancas...@affinegy.com> Subject: Update Documentation and Testing to Ubuntu 16.04 Core Committers, Carrie and I have discussed moving our recommended/base Linux development platform to Ubuntu 16.04. Currently it is at Ubuntu 14.04. Internally we are already using either 15.04 or 16.04 on our development systems, so I believe it will mainly be a matter of updating the documentation. What do others think? Thanks, Josh
_______________________________________________ Alljoyn-core mailing list Alljoyn-core@lists.alljoyn.org https://lists.alljoyn.org/mailman/listinfo/alljoyn-core
