We could also make the ticket notifications a little less noisy.  For example,
combining notifications that happen at the same time on the same ticket
https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/6305/  And could have less updates via
Igor (contractor to SourceForge) who tracks work with additional ticket numbers
internal to his systems.

On 10/15/13 1:14 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> That's a good use case and a separate bugs list is a good solution.  Asking
> everyone to set up a filter for the bugs is not too friendly.
> 
> For reference, spamassassin's dev list gets a lot of ticket updates.  Just an
> example, doesn't mean it's better.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-dev/
> 
> I'd be ok with tickets on a separate mailing list.
> 
> I'd also be interested in merging the allura-dev and allura-users mailing 
> lists.
>  The users list is very quiet currently and most new incubator projects only
> start with one (add the -users list when the need is there).
> 
> 
> On 10/15/13 1:01 PM, Daniel Hinojosa wrote:
>> Okay, thank you Rich. Then, this is a great topic for the list to come to
>> consensus on, yes?
>>
>> For my part, I would like to see a separate list for ticket and one for
>> discussion. Totally agree w/Rich on the value and I utilize a very similar
>> model to Rich's in this case.
>>
>> d.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Projects I'm involved in have a separate bugs@ mailing list where the
>>> tickets go. Historically, I do a terrible job of keeping up with ticket
>>> traffic, but am subscribed to various keywords (usually 'documentation' in
>>> my case) so that I can see what I need to see.
>>>
>>> If someone is heavily involved in development they would, of course, be
>>> subscribed to both lists, but if someone was casually involved, or trying
>>> to get involved, the huge volume of tickets traffic is somewhat
>>> overwhelming. Unfortunately, removing the tickets from the dev list leaves
>>> the impression that nothing happens on the dev list, which is also not true.
>>>
>>> So ... I don't know. I know we've discussed this before, and I should go
>>> back and read that. I'm sure we've already arrived at a consensus, and I
>>> just forgot in my frustration. :)
>>>
>>> I tried to set up GMail filters for the Allura tickets, but my patterns
>>> seem to be matching everything. I need to figure that out.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2013 11:33 AM, Daniel Hinojosa wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Rich,
>>>>
>>>> As our mentor, do you have a recommendation here? What is ASF best
>>>> practice
>>>> in this regard? Do other teams also do things as we do, or do they deal
>>>> with tickets only as tickets and have a separate discussion list?
>>>>
>>>> d.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I'm finding it very, very difficult to keep up with traffic on the dev
>>>>> mailing list, due to the huge volume of ticket auto-emails. I realize
>>>>> that
>>>>> most of the dev discussion does in fact happen in tickets, but the end
>>>>> result is that I'm simply not keeping up. I wonder if it might be time to
>>>>> split ticket mail into a separate list? Would that help, or would it just
>>>>> move the problem to another list?
>>>>>
>>>>> I really want to keep up with how the project is doing but I'm not sure
>>>>> how to do that as things are now, and I'm afraid that it also makes it
>>>>> very
>>>>> hard for new folks to get into the project.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Rich Bowen
>>>>> rbo...@rcbowen.com
>>>>> Shosholoza
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rich Bowen
>>> rbo...@rcbowen.com
>>> Shosholoza
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><

Reply via email to