On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Cory Johns <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have created a feature comparison chart comparing Allura to some other > OSS Forge platforms, at: > > https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Feature%20Comparison/ nice ! BTW other related comparisons are : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue-tracking_systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_time_tracking_software http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software > > I'd like to put it to the community for comment; are there any platforms or > features that should be added, yes, Apache™ Bloodhound ;) > are there any inaccuracies in the data, > if behavior added by plugin counts then afaict , yes . For Trac the matrix would look like BSD || Python || SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes || No Yes || Yes || Yes [1]_ || Yes [2]_ || Yes [3]_ || No || Yes || Yes || Yes [4]_ || Yes Apache™ Bloodhound should only differ in Project discovery = yes should it have more reference citations, etc? > .. [1] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DiscussionPlugin .. [2] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/FullBlogPlugin .. [3] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DownloadsPlugin .. [4] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/ThemeEnginePlugin [...] -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
