Awesome. Thanks, Olemis. Apache Bloodhound added and Trac updated.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Cory Johns <john...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have created a feature comparison chart comparing Allura to some other > > OSS Forge platforms, at: > > > > https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Feature%20Comparison/ > > > nice ! > > BTW other related comparisons are : > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue-tracking_systems > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_time_tracking_software > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software > > > > > > I'd like to put it to the community for comment; are there any platforms > or > > features that should be added, > > > yes, Apache™ Bloodhound > ;) > > > > are there any inaccuracies in the data, > > > > if behavior added by plugin counts then afaict , yes . For Trac the matrix > would look like > > BSD || Python || SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL || Yes || Yes || > Yes || Yes || Yes || No > Yes || Yes || Yes [1]_ || Yes [2]_ || Yes [3]_ || No || Yes || > Yes || Yes [4]_ || Yes > > Apache™ Bloodhound should only differ in Project discovery = yes > > should it have more reference citations, etc? > > > > .. [1] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DiscussionPlugin > .. [2] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/FullBlogPlugin > .. [3] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DownloadsPlugin > .. [4] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/ThemeEnginePlugin > > [...] > > -- > Regards, > > Olemis - @olemislc > > Apache™ Bloodhound contributor > http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound > http://blood-hound.net > > Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ > Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ > > Featured article: >
