>> keep in mind that this is likely to be no more efficient (and possibly >> less) than using esd or artsd. it still involves un-optimized IPC with >> a server process. > >How can you affirm that is a mistery for me: async notification, poll >and shared memory will make the difference (a big difference, believe >me).
this is all true. i was forgetting the important part about how the alsa server will operate. its still not going to run in sample-sync, but yes, it will be much better than esd (i don't know enough about artsd). sorry for the unintended misinformation. --p _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
