>Are you serious about xml? Do you have smoked something weird? xml was just an example. i happen to like it, because there are standard parsers, and standard presentation tools. but i wasn't seriously suggesting it as an alternative. i would just feel more comfortable with a language that wasn't invented here.
>A sensible alternative was something Lisp like, but I've preferred to >have something more user friendly. you really think that the syntax enumerated in the docs and the source and the system-wide file is more user friendly than lisp? --p _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
