On Thursday 03 July 2003 14:16, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At 02 Jul 2003 21:24:57 -0400, > > Manuel Jander wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I wrote support for the Hardware Equalizer (10 band stereo = 20 > > controls) for the Aureal Vortex cards. For testing purposes i used the > > controls as "MIXER" type controls, so they are visible from any mixer. > > The question: How should they be named ? Is the type "MIXER" acceptable > > ? In my opinion it is at least pretty convenient. > > MXIER should be fine. > > the name is still an open question, but it's not strict at all.
I think this is true for all control names, isn't it. At least I have not found a naming scheme (just tell me if I have missed the corresponding docs). I actually would prefer if it would be more strict. Or to have a method to know what the function of the control is. I find it very hard to write a generic mixer application without knowing the function of the control. If I knew the functions, I could do better grouping in kmix. Currenty the controls/sliders are just sorted by ID, which sometimes is not-so-userfriendly. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
