On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:12:45 -0800 Noah Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik Steffl wrote: > > > > > so while you are pretty much right that alsa is not easy to > > configure, it's not easy to figure out what is supported for > > particular cards etc. it's all work in progress. Maybe it's not for > > you at this time (that's not elitist remark, alsa simply does not > > provide what you want _at this time_) > > I wonder then, why does it have a 1.x version number? And why it has been incorporated into a stable kernel. -- Richard Kimber http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
