On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:43:42 -0400 Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 02:39 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > > No, I don't. > > > > I realize that there were Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT, > > Windows 2000, Windows XP. > > > > Or Solaris 4..10. > > > > Or whatever. > > > > That is, from time to time binary interface specs get updated as > > necessary. > > > > Now, symmetrically, do you realize that refusal to stabilize ABI > > indicates failure first to think and then to do ? > > > > > > That is, Linux was not the first to implement suspend/resume, so > > not taking this into account indicates a flaw/failure in the first > > place. > > > > Um, the XP kernel has not been updated in years! You are proposing we > go to a Microsoft-like release schedule where we only update the kernel > every 3-4 years. > > You would have to be insane to propose that. > > You obviously don't know the first thing about how kernel development > works. > > This thread is over. Please do not cc: me on any more replies. I can't > have a conversation with an unreasonable person. > > Lee > > > > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-user mailing list > Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user > One of really nice human features is the ability to understand other person's reason. I want to be able to install updated (ALSA or any Linux for that matter) driver with no more clicks/keystrokes I need under Windows - however much I dislike Windows. This is my reason. If present Linux development kernel does not allow me to do this, then the model is at fault. _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
