Ignore my long-winded response... what he said.

On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Justin Bozonier wrote:

> I'd like to add that I actually have more tests that hit the db because it is 
> so easy and due to being able to have it be an in memory database.
> 
> also while you don't do DI and IoC containers like you do in C#, the concept 
> is still there.
> 
> We should go over how I've been working on PocketLoot one day at work, it's 
> pretty different from the way you're used to working.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:44 AM, Bobby Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> to be fair the database in question is a built for the test run sqlite db by 
>> default seeded with known data. DI, IoC are less useful in a language where 
>> everything is so easy to redefine.
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Ryan Riley <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Yep, all true.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Erick Thompson <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> > Rob Conery's post on WebMatrix had a comment by Rob in response to a
>> > by Ian Cooper [1]. The comment exchange is well worth the read
>> > (alt.net throwdown!) but what caught my eye the statement that
>> > Ruby/Rails/Sinatra doesn't use (or really have) DI, IoC or often have
>> > tests that don't hit the database. Not having done much with
>> > Ruby/Rails/Sinatra aside from a few small projects to learn the
>> > langauge/basic framework and knowing that at least a few people here
>> > do use and like these - is this true???
>> >
>> > Erick
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > http://blog.wekeroad.com/microsoft/someone-hit-their-head#comment-129723733
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at 
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>> >
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be 
>> correct." 
>> 
>> - Occam’s Razor
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to