I don't have a beef so much... I have sympathy for some of the complexities but James did say that nLog > log4net.
I'm trying to use it in code that is NOT an application... just dynamically loaded binaries. log4net doesn't appreciate that. I think reflector might help me figure out why that's an issue. First however, I'm going to try nLog and see if that resolves my problem. I'm using a framework because I want it to be a black box not so I can learn about their hawt sawce. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Tim Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Dude, what's your beef with log4net? Curious if it's similar to mine. It > cost me 4 hrs yesterday. @#$% > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Justin Bozonier > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yeah Kelly... I think for example I should have been using it yesterday >> for figuring out log4net. In fact, I may swing back around to that problem >> with this tool in mind. >> >> Matt- Pure curiousity and learning I totally get and yeah. Makes sense. >> There's enough here to warrant a second look. Thanks guys and if you have >> some other uses please keep sending them. It's REALLY interesting to me. >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Frank Schwieterman >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> There are a lot of uses, I remember one that stands out... From my >>> C++ days, I had assumed List<> was implemented as a linked list. >>> Using reflector I realized its an array. When I discovered this, I >>> had a serious performance problem as I was relying on a linked list >>> implementation. Very embarrassing, and a bit of a trip when so many >>> people said "well of course a List<> is an array". >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ian Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I have used it for a number of the items Matt listed. Also: >>> > >>> > Finding bugs in third party libs that I don't have source access to >>> > (sometimes patching the library in question) >>> > Figuring out remoting errors (back when remoting was used) >>> > Seeing how code compiles into different languages >>> > Figuring out what classes implement a particular interface >>> > Figuring out how .NET implement primitive types >>> > Looking at generated IL to analyze performance implications >>> > >>> > I will never use [,] for arrays, jagged ([][]) is incredibly faster >>> > >>> > I am sure there are more >>> > -Ian >>> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Justin Bozonier <[email protected] >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> So a couple people now are surprised.. nay, shocked that I don't use >>> >> Reflector and I'm pretty sure that means I would have more ninjitsu if >>> >> I did. What problems are you guys solving with it? >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
