Does 
*this*<http://haacked.com/archive/2006/08/08/Log4NetAndExternalConfigurationFileInASP.NET2.0.aspx>sound
like your problem?  I'm not trying to defend log4net, and I've
heard/read the same things about nLog, but I know how much it bugs me when I
can't figure out *why* something doesn't work, even if/when I've worked
around or moved on...

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Justin Bozonier <[email protected]>wrote:

> I don't have a beef so much... I have sympathy for some of the complexities
> but James did say that nLog > log4net.
>
> I'm trying to use it in code that is NOT an application... just dynamically
> loaded binaries. log4net doesn't appreciate that. I think reflector might
> help me figure out why that's an issue. First however, I'm going to try nLog
> and see if that resolves my problem. I'm using a framework because I want it
> to be a black box not so I can learn about their hawt sawce.
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Tim Erickson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dude, what's your beef with log4net?  Curious if it's similar to mine.  It
>> cost me 4 hrs yesterday.  @#$%
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Justin Bozonier 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Yeah Kelly... I think for example I should have been using it yesterday
>>> for figuring out log4net.  In fact, I may swing back around to that problem
>>> with this tool in mind.
>>>
>>> Matt- Pure curiousity and learning I totally get and yeah. Makes sense.
>>> There's enough here to warrant a second look. Thanks guys and if you have
>>> some other uses please keep sending them. It's REALLY interesting to me.
>>>  On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Frank Schwieterman 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  There are a lot of uses, I remember one that stands out...  From my
>>>> C++ days, I had assumed List<> was implemented as a linked list.
>>>> Using reflector I realized its an array.  When I discovered this, I
>>>> had a serious performance problem as I was relying on a linked list
>>>> implementation.  Very embarrassing, and a bit of a trip when so many
>>>> people said "well of course a List<> is an array".
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ian Davis <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I have used it for a number of the items Matt listed. Also:
>>>> >
>>>> > Finding bugs in third party libs that I don't have source access to
>>>> > (sometimes patching the library in question)
>>>> > Figuring out remoting errors (back when remoting was used)
>>>> > Seeing how code compiles into different languages
>>>> > Figuring out what classes implement a particular interface
>>>> > Figuring out how .NET implement primitive types
>>>> > Looking at generated IL to analyze performance implications
>>>> >
>>>> > I will never use [,] for arrays, jagged ([][]) is incredibly faster
>>>> >
>>>> > I am sure there are more
>>>> > -Ian
>>>> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Justin Bozonier <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So a couple people now are surprised.. nay, shocked that I don't use
>>>> >> Reflector and I'm pretty sure that means I would have more ninjitsu
>>>> if
>>>> >> I did. What problems are you guys solving with it?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> > [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to