Hi, I think the discovery framework defined in that draft is quite interesting and has someting in common with draft-song-alto-server-discovery. We will look through that draft in detail. More feedback from the authors of draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery is really appreciated.
----- 原邮件 ----- 发件人: Yu-Shun Wang <[email protected]> 日期: 星期五, 三月 27日, 2009 上午6:45 主题: Re: [alto] ALTO Discovery and draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery 收件人: Matt Lepinski <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for the advice. Also would like to point out that > we actually cited the GeoPriv work (though -07). So it is > on the list of more complete frameworks that we will look > into next. > > Thanks, > yushun > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Matt Lepinski > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [alto] ALTO Discovery and draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery > > Just wanted to quickly re-iterate a point that Martin Thomson had > made > during today's ALTO meeting. > > GEOPRIV has been working (for well over a year) on the following > problem:"How does a device locate a server providing a given > service that is > topologically close (in a network topology sense) to the device" > > In the case of GEOPRIV, the service in question is a 'Location > Information Server (LIS)', but a believe that the problem of > discovering > a "local" (in a network topology sense) alto server has many > similar > challenges as the GEOPRIV discovery problem. > > Based on my experience in GEOPRIV, I believe that getting this > type of > discovery to work well in all cases is quite hard (especially if > one has > security concerns regarding an attacker who may try to impersonate > a > legitimate provider of the service [be it ALTO or LIS]). > > Currently, the work in GEOPRIV is still incomplete, but I would > encourage anyone whose been thinking about ALTO discovery to read > draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery-08, and if you have any insights > on how > to improve the GEOPRIV document based on your experience with > ALTO, > please send comments to the GEOPRIV list (and the authors). Also, > perhaps we can get several people who have been thinking about > GEOPRIV > discovery to review the ALTO discovery documents. (I'm happy to > volunteer, though I'm definitely not as much of an expert on this > topic > as Martin and James, who I have been kind enough to CC <grin>). > > - Matt Lepinski > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
