Hi folks, Sorry for being so slow with coming back to this, I got sidetracked with other stuff.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Alimi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Martin Stiemerling; stefano previdi > Subject: Re: [alto] General comment about draft-penno-alto-protocol- > 03.txt > > Hi Martin, > > Thank you for the comments. > > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 8:37:10 am Martin Stiemerling wrote: > > Stefano, > > > > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > > > > I've just learned in the session that there is actually a loss of > > > > functionality in the merger between Proxidor & P4P: the sorting > > > > server-based oracle is just gone. > > > > > > Proxidor capability of ranking/rating paths is still there and > > > functionality > > > is entirely preserved. > > > > > > See section 4 of the draft for details. > > > > hmm, which part of section 4? > > In addition to Stefano's response, see Section 7.3 and slides 36-38 of > the > slides from today: > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/alto-5.ppt > > These depict how the use case works in some more detail. The use case is explained but I still cannot understand how this is handled in the protocol specification. I.e., a use case is not a protocol spec. Martin [email protected] NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
