Hi Stefano,
> -----Original Message----- > From: stefano previdi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:43 PM > To: Martin Stiemerling > Cc: alto > Subject: Re: [alto] General comment about draft-penno-alto-protocol- > 03.txt > > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > > > Stefano, > > > >> > >> On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > >>> I've just learned in the session that there is actually a loss of > >>> functionality in the merger between Proxidor & P4P: the sorting > >>> server-based oracle is just gone. > >> > >> Proxidor capability of ranking/rating paths is still there and > >> functionality > >> is entirely preserved. > >> > >> See section 4 of the draft for details. > > > > hmm, which part of section 4? > > > > I assume that still the sorting feature *at the server* > > I'm not sure I understand "at the server"... > > if you refer to the case where: > - client send list of addresses > - server rank/rate/sort them > - server replies with an ordered list > > then, this is what we do in section 4. Section 4 is about path rating but not about "rating at the server" as you've described above and I was also referring to. Or I cannot find the part where it is defined. Martin _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
