Reinaldo, On 27 Jun 2011, at 17:28, Reinaldo Penno wrote:
> I second having 1:1 relationship. We explored having an IP address in more > than one PID during the protocol design and there were some difficult cases. > > Having said that, a _private_ IPv4 can and would certainly appear in more > than one PID if these represent different VRFs. It goes back to some of the > gaps identified in penno-cdn Probably something to pick up and discuss in more depth at a later date probably but IMO different VRFs are different networks with different topologies and should probably be best represented by independent ALTO network maps. It's not just restricted to private IP addresses either if one considers the cases of extranet VPNs or of CDNs that use multiple topology maps. Ben _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
