Hi Rich, Vijay,

No action makes sense to me. From this experience, I may suggest that we
add a suggestive sentence about
potential issues of not handling chunked encoding, just for the benefit of
readers. What do you know?

Richard

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Richard Alimi <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/2012 10:29 PM, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> I think we know the issue of the extra numbers before and after the
>>> json return: the server used chunked encoding:
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>  A client supporting chunked encoding will remove those number and a
>>> client (e.g., nc) does not will keep them.
>>>
>>
>> Richard: OK, that explains the numbers in nc output.
>>
>>
>>  The examples in the current spec all use content length. Do we want
>>> to say something here or not?
>>>
>>
>> I am leaning to no primarily because rfc2616 makes it mandatory to
>> receive and decode the chunked transfer encoding.  Since nc is not
>> rfc2616 compliant, but we require ALTO clients to be (section 6.3 of
>> the ALTO protocol), I think we do not need to specify anything more.
>>
>>
> FWIW, I believe in an earlier version of the draft we were more explicit
> and specified that clients must support chunked encoding.  The guidance we
> received at that point was to not reiterate details from the rfc2616.
>
> Rich
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - vijay
>> --
>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / 
>> vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.**com<[email protected]>
>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/**vkg/<http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> alto mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/alto<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to