Vijay, Richard,

On 6 Nov 2012, at 19:15, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:

> On 11/06/2012 11:46 AM, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
>> Hi Rich, Vijay,
>> 
>> No action makes sense to me. From this experience, I may suggest that we
>> add a suggestive sentence about
>> potential issues of not handling chunked encoding, just for the benefit
>> of readers. What do you know?
> 
> Richard: I am rather conflicted on what to do.  Clearly, nc is not a
> RFC2616 client, and just as clearly, any RFC2616 client will support
> chunked encoding.
> 
> I also realize that we spent some time at the bakeoff looking at the
> byte count prefix in nc(1) but not correlating it immediately with the
> "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header, so saying something seems
> appropriate.

IMO there is no need to say anything. RFCs are about interoperability. The ALTO 
protocol spec states that RFC2616 compliance is a MUST, therefore the 
specification should not make accommodation for interoperability with clients 
that do not conform to RFC2616.

I think doing anything else would lead to re-iterating the whole of RFC2616.

Ben

> 
> In the end, I think I will chalk this upto us being tired and cranky
> late at night.
> 
> But, if the editor team of the protocol document can find a place to
> exhort implementations to pay attention to transfer encodings applied
> to message bodies without reiterating rfc2616, then please proceed.  I
> tried to spend some time thinking how to do this, but could not arrive
> at a reasonable set of words.  So alas, I cannot contribute any text
> to get you started ...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> -- 
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to