On 02/21/2014 08:09 AM, Jan Seedorf wrote:
The text looks good to me and in my view reflects the agreement on
re-chartering in the ALTO WG.
Just two small comments:
-- "where the host was a peer in a P2P network and desired to be
rendezvoused with other peers for file sharing" --> When talking
about the P2P use case I would not use past tense but present tense.
P2P is still out there and in principle the use case is technically
still a valid one. The text in past tense reads to me like ALTO has
extensively been used for this use case in the past (not really
true), and should not been used for P2P anymore (also not really
true)
-- "JSON-path" --> "JSON-patch"
Jan: Good catch. Fixed both of these. The charter draft is available
at the ALTO Wiki http://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/trac/wiki
Cheers,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
