Hi all,

The text and proposed extension topics cover well the proposals and related 
concerns that have been discussed in the WG.

I would suggest two minor text additions, (referring at the version on 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/trac/wiki/v0.1-recharter)

Suggestion 1 - in paragraph 1: to reflect the will of ALTO to preserve network 
information confidentiality while expressing network provider preferences, I 
propose to insert text as follows:   

Current: "having access to a pair of maps: a topology map and a cost map."
Proposed: "having access to a pair of maps +++ providing an abstracted view of 
the network infrastructure as seen by its operator +++ : a topology map and a 
cost map." 

Suggestion 2 - in extension item class "(Informational) A survey of 
techniques": to take into account the growing complexity of considered networks 
with the wireless use cases brought to the group, I propose to insert text (of 
item N° 2) as follows:

Current: " ... that would facilitate advanced graph computation. ... "
Proposed: " ... that would facilitate advanced graph computation +++ in 
(complex/)heterogeneous network environments +++. ... " 

Best regards,
Sabine


-----Message d'origine-----
De : alto [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Vijay K. Gurbani
Envoyé : vendredi 21 février 2014 22:43
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [alto] Text proposal for charter update

On 02/21/2014 08:09 AM, Jan Seedorf wrote:
> The text looks good to me and in my view reflects the agreement on 
> re-chartering in the ALTO WG.
>
> Just two small comments:
> -- "where the host was a peer in a P2P network and desired to be 
> rendezvoused with other peers for file sharing" --> When talking about 
> the P2P use case I would not use past tense but present tense.
> P2P is still out there and in principle the use case is technically 
> still a valid one. The text in past tense reads to me like ALTO has 
> extensively been used for this use case in the past (not really true), 
> and should not been used for P2P anymore (also not really
> true)
> -- "JSON-path" --> "JSON-patch"

Jan: Good catch.  Fixed both of these.  The charter draft is available at the 
ALTO Wiki http://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/trac/wiki

Cheers,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 
9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to