Richard,
I'd love to hear how the JSON Patch designers expect JSON Patch to be
integrated into a JSON library. I have my guesses as to what such a
library would look like, and I know the problems I think that would have
with large ALTO cost & network maps, but I'll wait until I see whether
they come up with something better than I would have.
Of course, I hope you realize that it will be impossible to rigorously
prove that no one could *ever* design a JSON Patch library that works well
with large ALTO maps. :-) The best we can do is show that a given approach
has difficulty scaling up.
- Wendy
It will be difficult to prove that no one can develop a good library for
JSON Patch.
On 07/18/2014, 12:55, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Before we draw the conclusion that JSON Patch mostly will add more work, I
>still prefer that it is more rigorously "proven" that it is hard to
>develop
>a good library for JSON Patch. I took the liberty of cc'ing the co-authors
>of JSON Patch, hoping that they may provide additional pointers.
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
