Wendy, On Jul 19, 2014 2:54 AM, "Wendy Roome" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Richard, > > I'd love to hear how the JSON Patch designers expect JSON Patch to be > integrated into a JSON library. I have my guesses as to what such a > library would look like,
I thought a bit how one might design an easy to use library as well. Agree with you that it would be hard to "prove" :-） Let's wait to try to hear from some JSON Patch experts. I want to distinguish two aspects: (1) first easy to use, (2) then efficiency. These will be good challenges that we post to this technique :-） Always great post from you that is engaging and I learn much... Richard and I know the problems I think that would have > with large ALTO cost & network maps, but I'll wait until I see whether > they come up with something better than I would have. > > Of course, I hope you realize that it will be impossible to rigorously > prove that no one could *ever* design a JSON Patch library that works well > with large ALTO maps. :-) The best we can do is show that a given approach > has difficulty scaling up. > > - Wendy > > It will be difficult to prove that no one can develop a good library for > JSON Patch. > > On 07/18/2014, 12:55, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Before we draw the conclusion that JSON Patch mostly will add more work, I > >still prefer that it is more rigorously "proven" that it is hard to > >develop > >a good library for JSON Patch. I took the liberty of cc'ing the co-authors > >of JSON Patch, hoping that they may provide additional pointers. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
