On 08/11/2014 02:15 PM, Sebastian Kiesel wrote:
Richard,
all,
a less intrusive clarification would be:
"An endpoint property resource provides information about properties for
individual endpoints. In addition to the "pid" endpoint property (see
Sections 7.1.1 and 11.4.1.4), further endpoint properties MAY be
provided by an ALTO server."
what do you think?
I looked at this proposal with Richard, and talked about it with Martin.
It doesn't have the conflict with the "pid" MUST that's in the approved
text, and doesn't change normative behavior in a way that would surprise
anyone who reviewed the document. Nice work.
I haven't seen any response on this mailing list, so I'm asking Richard
to provide this text to the RFC Editor to close what I believe is the
last AUTH48 issue on ALTO's premier specification.
Thanks for working through this.
Spencer
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
