Hi Spencer, all,

Thank for so much for working together on solving this last AUTH48
technical problem!

Richard



On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Spencer Dawkins <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 08/11/2014 02:15 PM, Sebastian Kiesel wrote:
>
>> Richard,
>> all,
>>
>> a less intrusive clarification would be:
>>
>> "An endpoint property resource provides information about properties for
>> individual endpoints.  In addition to the "pid" endpoint property (see
>> Sections 7.1.1 and 11.4.1.4), further endpoint properties MAY be
>> provided by an ALTO server."
>>
>> what do you think?
>>
>
> I looked at this proposal with Richard, and talked about it with Martin.
> It doesn't have the conflict with the "pid" MUST that's in the approved
> text, and doesn't change normative behavior in a way that would surprise
> anyone who reviewed the document. Nice work.
>
> I haven't seen any response on this mailing list, so I'm asking Richard to
> provide this text to the RFC Editor to close what I believe is the last
> AUTH48 issue on ALTO's premier specification.
>
> Thanks for working through this.
>
> Spencer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>



-- 
-- 
 =====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
 =====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to