Well, draft-ietf-alto-deployments is not *my* draft - I just volunteered a long time ago to help the WG completing it.
I could see value in including draft-seidel-alto-map-calculation, even if we are post WGLC. Personally, I'd also be open to add another author/editor. But I am interested in completing draft-ietf-alto-deployments soon, i.e., not further delaying it by several IETF meetings. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 4:42 PM > To: Scharf, Michael (Michael); Hans Seidel > Cc: IETF ALTO > Subject: ALTO deployment considerations and map calculation draft > > Michael, Hans: Pursuant to our virtual meeting yesterday, I have been > thinking whether Hans' draft [1] has any input that can go into > Michael's deployment draft [2]? > > Can I kindly request the authors to inform the working group if there > is any beneficial overlap from [1] that we may take into [2]? I > realize that [2] has been through WGLC so I am not expecting > large-scale changes in it. But if there is any deployment-related > experience from [1] that can be put into [2], we should do our due > diligence and make sure that we reflect that experience. > > Thanks! > > [1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seidel-alto-map-calculation/ > [2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-deployments/ > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
