Richard Yang wrote:
Vijay, Michael,
[...]
I liked draft-seidel-alto-map-calculation, and support that we report
the results in an RFC.
Richard, whether and in which track draft-siedel-...-calculation moves
ahead will get hashed out on the list, I am sure. Probably sooner
rather than later.
I share the same interest: completing the deployment doc soon. One
procedural question. If we add content from
draft-seidel-alto-map-calculation to the deployment doc, do we need
to go through a WGLC again?
If we end up taking some text from draft-siedel-...-calculation, then
yes, we'd socialize the change with the WG. However, it does not have
to be a WGLC again, just a revision that presents the newly added text
to the WG.
In the past, I have authored drafts and been part of WGs where new text
is added after the WGLC. The change gets socialized, and if the feeling
in the WG is that the change is substantial, then a second WGLC may get
issued. However, I don't think that will be the case here. I suspect
we can identify if there is any information we can carry into
draft-...-deployment-considerations, and if so we can revise the draft
to socialize the change and move it ahead.
The bigger issue is finding the time for the authors (or list members)
to scan draf-siedel-...-calculation and see if there is any text that
is worth including in draft-...-deployment-considerations. The sooner
this happens, the better.
Hans, Michael: If you could devote a bit of time to determining this,
it'll be great.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
