Folks: As the (draft) minutes [1] of IETF 96 reflect, there was general consensus on adoption of the ALTO traffic engineering cost metrics (draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-08) draft as a deliverable towards protocol extensions to convey a richer set of attributes.
Some concern was expressed on the list about the the privacy aspects related to sharing some of the metrics. These metrics remain optional, and an ALTO server that does not want to provide these is not bound to do so. There was also advice from the AD to harmonize this work with the metric registry work being done in IPPM. The chairs would like the authors to ensure that the above two items are reflected in any discussion that arises in the context of adopting this draft as a working group item. The call for adoption runs for two weeks, from Mon Aug 1, 2016 to Mon Aug 15, 2016. This will be a good time to comment on the list and inform the working group of any issues with adopting this items, or whether the working group was remiss in considering other documents. Please post to the list. (Even a simple "I support this document towards charter deliverable" is a good indication.) Thanks, [1] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-alto - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
