support! Dhruv
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani < [email protected]> wrote: > Folks: As the (draft) minutes [1] of IETF 96 reflect, there was general > consensus on adoption of the ALTO traffic engineering cost metrics > (draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-08) draft as a deliverable towards protocol > extensions to convey a richer set of attributes. > > Some concern was expressed on the list about the the privacy aspects > related to sharing some of the metrics. These metrics remain optional, > and an ALTO server that does not want to provide these is not bound to > do so. > > There was also advice from the AD to harmonize this work with the metric > registry work being done in IPPM. > > The chairs would like the authors to ensure that the above two items are > reflected in any discussion that arises in the context of adopting this > draft as a working group item. > > The call for adoption runs for two weeks, from Mon Aug 1, 2016 to Mon > Aug 15, 2016. This will be a good time to comment on the list and > inform the working group of any issues with adopting this items, or > whether the working group was remiss in considering other documents. > Please post to the list. (Even a simple "I support this document > towards charter deliverable" is a good indication.) > > Thanks, > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-alto > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: [email protected] / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
