All: In preparation for moving the unified property draft [0] ahead, the minutes of the December 2017 Virtual Interim Meeting [1] indicate that the chairs seek answers to the following questions from the WG:
(1) Are cellular addresses an important abstraction that the working group will like to introduce in ALTO? Currently, cellular address format is specified in a companion draft [2]. (2) If yes, is the unified-props-new draft the correct place to add the cellular representation? Please note that the unified property draft [0] gates path-vector [3], as there is a dependency of path-vector on unified-props. Thus, the plan is to move these two drafts ahead as a bundle. Which means that we need to reach a conclusion on the questions posed above so unified-props and path-vector can move ahead. Please express an substantive opinion on the above questions in the mailing list. [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/ [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-alto-01/materials/minutes-interim-2017-alto-01-201712180600/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/ Thank you, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani / [email protected] Network Data Science, Nokia Networks Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
