Hi Vijay,
Thanks for the reply, it is a good point that the result should also be sent in
the update stream service.
Besides, there is another point that the result should also be sent in the
update stream service. If the server process requests asynchronously, when it
receives the request from the client and insert it in its queue, it will first
send a response back to the client; and after the server successfully processed
the request, it will send a reply via the update stream service.. This case
requires the server to indicate the state of the “remove” operation in the
reply. A simple attribute “state” with type JSON boolean in the UpdateStream
ControlEvent can solve the concern. If "state" is false, the operation fails;
if "state" is true, the operation succeeds.
object {
[String control-uri;]
[Boolean state;]
[String remove<1..*>;]
} UpdateStreamControlEvent;
This is my idea for option 2.
Wish to hear opinions from others in the group.
Best Wishes,
Dawn
________________________________________
From: alto <[email protected]> on behalf of Y. Richard Yang
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 3:57:14 AM
To: Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US)
Cc: IETF ALTO
Subject: Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
Dear Vijay, Jan,
Thank you so much. It is a wonderful idea to check the WG for additional
comments on the mentioned issues. The authors will address suggestions, if any,
and then move the document forward.
Thanks!
Richard
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vijay K. Gurbani
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Folks: Jan and I would like to move SSE [1] to WGLC.
Looking at the mailing list, we note that the authors are asking input
from the WG on an issue in SSE [2].
We would kindly request the WG to spend some time thinking about the
question being asked in [2] and to chime in with some thoughts.
Assuming that there is no response by next week on this, the authors can
proceed with their default position on this, for which they have an
articulated reason in [2].
Jan and I will follow up next week and if there has not been any further
list discussion on this, we will move the work ahead to WGLC.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/
[2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03684.html
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani / [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
--
--
=====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> |
| Professor of Computer Science |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
=====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
