Richard, Dawn: As per [1], we need to move SSE ahead. Since the posting of [1], there has been some discussion on the remaining open issue with SSE; this discussion is captured in [2].
So, I think it is time to move the work ahead with the consensus reached in [2]. Please issue a new version of the SSE draft by Monday. As soon as it appears in the IETF archives, Jan and I will start a WGLC on it. Further discussions --- if any --- on the consensus reached in [2], can be held as part of WGLC. [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03686.html [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03684.html Thanks, On 06/11/2018 05:50 PM, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > Hi Vijay, all > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM Vijay K. Gurbani > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Dawn: Yes, pipelining is another good reason to send the response in > the update stream control service. > > This, and the other reasons I indicate in a different thread [1] > makes me prefer option 2. > > > +1 > > Richard > > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03687.html - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani / [email protected] Network Data Science, Nokia Networks Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
