Great suggestion, Christian! Qiao: thanks for pointing out the related work. The IWQoS'17 and ICNP'16 work are highly related indeed.
Shawn: I will be more than happy to review the addition of the table, as Christian suggested. It can be part of the draft, or you can post such a table on the mailing list for discussions, as IETF uses mailing list as one key venue of discussions. Thanks! Richard On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:09 PM Qiao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Great suggestion! I fully agree. Such a table would be very helpful! > > Shawn: I understand this is not a complete list. Just a reminder that you > should add Kai's IWQoS'17 paper (NOVA) and its previous ICNP'16 poster > paper (ORSAP) in the survey. They are based on the ALTO-PV and ALTO-RSA > drafts. > > > Best > Qiao > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:06 PM Christian Esteve Rothenberg < > [email protected] <[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Nice work! >> >> In line with Jensen questions, I was going to suggest adding the RFC / >> draft info to the Implementation details, e.g. Network Map, Cost Map, >> Unified Property Map, Path Vector. >> Especially highlighting the proposed extensions would help to identify >> the need to move these extensions forward to become RFC, and/or >> eventually be merged, if / after we realize through a proper Table >> mapping proposed extensions to use case implementations and citations. >> Such a table could also incorporate the additional requirements >> suggested by Jensen and altogether contribute to a potential WG >> recharter. >> >> -ch >> Em seg, 11 de jun de 2018 às 03:32, Jensen Zhang >> <[email protected]> escreveu: >> > >> > Hi Shawn, >> > >> > Thank you a lot! Also, thank Dawn and Danny. A survey on the current >> ALTO related works is very helpful. >> > >> > I believe your classification for the ALTO use cases is based on the >> role ALTO plays in the existing system. Do we have any summary of the >> requirements? All of them use the standard ALTO without any modification or >> extension? I believe such information is more useful and should be >> considered in the survey. Because we try to understand what are the >> essential additional requirements for newer scenarios. It will decide >> whether we need to recharter the WG. >> > >> > Best, >> > Jensen >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:21 PM Shawn Lin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear ALTOers, >> >> >> >> >> >> @Dawn, @Danny and I are working on a survey of ALTO. Our goal is to >> understand what ALTO can already do in the real system, how others use ALTO >> and the additional requirements for newer applications (like SDN, NFV, >> Block-chain network) to do the traffic optimization. >> >> >> >> Currently, we have a deck of slides and a skeleton of our draft. We >> had some wonderful discussions with @Richard and @Sabine! So here we would >> like to share the slides with the WG and get feedback from WG members. I >> believe it is a good way to summarize the current status and look into the >> next step :) >> >> >> >> The current slides include 6 ALTO implementations (from open source >> project, academic research, and company production) and 18 use cases (from >> IETF drafts/slides, papers, and white papers) in 5 categories like below: >> >> >> >> >> >> ALTO Use Cases >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> +--> Information Source >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Path Selection in MPTS-AR >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Locate Content in Mobile Edge Cache >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Virtualized Service Function Chain Placement >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Intelligent VM Placement >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Service Placement in IoT >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> +--> Ranking Server >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> A Peer Ranking Service for P2P Streaming >> >> >> >> | | Information >> >> >> >> | +---> A Service to Select CDN Surrogate >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> A Service to Select CDN Servers from >> >> >> >> | | Different SDN Domains >> >> >> >> | +---> A Service to Select downstream CDN >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> A Service to Guide the Peer Connection >> >> >> >> | in Blockchain >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> +--> Network Abstraction >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Network Abstraction Provider in SDN >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Topology Abstraction for VPN Scale-out >> >> >> >> | | Decisions >> >> >> >> | +---> ALTO being Used to Solving n2 Problem >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> |--> Information Exchanger >> >> >> >> | | >> >> >> >> | +---> Network Behaviors Exchanger between >> >> >> >> | Providers >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> +--> Measure Results Interface >> >> >> >> | >> >> >> >> +---> An Interface to Query on the LMAP >> >> >> >> measure results >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We attach the slides below. You can also access the editable version >> in Google Slides: >> >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aXIZfUjQrSFhkVIUbvt2ouKWqLgGq4kbG-EBmSaZtKo/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> >> >> Any comments or suggestions are welcomed and appreciated! >> >> >> >> Bests, >> >> Shawn Lin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> alto mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > alto mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > > > -- > Qiao Xiang > Postdoctoral Fellow, > Department of Computer Science, > Yale University > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
