Hi Jensen, Vijay, Christian, Qiao, and Richard,

Thank you so much for your confirmations and fruitful suggestions!

We created a Google Sheets [1] to collect such information. Please feel
free to edit or comment on it!
The current header of this Google Sheets mainly includes "Paper/Project/RFC
Name", "Cited", "Year", "Extend Standard ALTO or not", "How they use
ALTO?", "Challenges and Research Opportunities", "Others" and "Catagory".

Qiao: Just add NOVA and ORSAP, please see row 124 and 125.

[1]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dgbVApnyyiIjbSFp49jSIz3XQHMbmme3WXMQfOZVpY0/edit?usp=sharing

Bests,
Shawn

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:22 AM Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Great suggestion, Christian!
>
> Qiao: thanks for pointing out the related work. The IWQoS'17 and ICNP'16
> work are highly related indeed.
>
> Shawn: I will be more than happy to review the addition of the table, as
> Christian suggested. It can be part of the draft, or you can post such a
> table on the mailing list for discussions, as IETF uses mailing list as one
> key venue of discussions.
>
> Thanks!
> Richard
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:09 PM Qiao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Great suggestion! I fully agree. Such a table would be very helpful!
>>
>> Shawn: I understand this is not a complete list. Just a reminder that you
>> should add Kai's IWQoS'17 paper (NOVA) and its previous ICNP'16 poster
>> paper (ORSAP) in the survey. They are based on the ALTO-PV and ALTO-RSA
>> drafts.
>>
>>
>> Best
>> Qiao
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:06 PM Christian Esteve Rothenberg <
>> [email protected] <[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice work!
>>>
>>> In line with Jensen questions, I was going to suggest adding the RFC /
>>> draft info to the Implementation details, e.g. Network Map, Cost Map,
>>> Unified Property Map, Path Vector.
>>> Especially highlighting the proposed extensions would help to identify
>>> the need to move these extensions forward to become RFC, and/or
>>> eventually be merged, if / after we realize through a proper Table
>>> mapping proposed extensions to use case implementations and citations.
>>> Such a table could also incorporate the additional requirements
>>> suggested by Jensen and altogether contribute to a potential WG
>>> recharter.
>>>
>>> -ch
>>> Em seg, 11 de jun de 2018 às 03:32, Jensen Zhang
>>> <[email protected]> escreveu:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Shawn,
>>> >
>>> > Thank you a lot! Also, thank Dawn and Danny. A survey on the current
>>> ALTO related works is very helpful.
>>> >
>>> > I believe your classification for the ALTO use cases is based on the
>>> role ALTO plays in the existing system. Do we have any summary of the
>>> requirements? All of them use the standard ALTO without any modification or
>>> extension? I believe such information is more useful and should be
>>> considered in the survey. Because we try to understand what are the
>>> essential additional requirements for newer scenarios. It will decide
>>> whether we need to recharter the WG.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > Jensen
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:21 PM Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Dear ALTOers,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> @Dawn, @Danny and I are working on a survey of ALTO. Our goal is to
>>> understand what ALTO can already do in the real system, how others use ALTO
>>> and the additional requirements for newer applications (like SDN, NFV,
>>> Block-chain network) to do the traffic optimization.
>>> >>
>>> >> Currently, we have a deck of slides and a skeleton of our draft. We
>>> had some wonderful discussions with @Richard and @Sabine! So here we would
>>> like to share the slides with the WG and get feedback from WG members. I
>>> believe it is a good way to summarize the current status and look into the
>>> next step :)
>>> >>
>>> >> The current slides include 6 ALTO implementations (from open source
>>> project, academic research, and company production) and 18 use cases (from
>>> IETF drafts/slides, papers, and white papers) in 5 categories like below:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ALTO Use Cases
>>> >>
>>> >>   |
>>> >>
>>> >>   +--> Information Source
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Path Selection in MPTS-AR
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Locate Content in Mobile Edge Cache
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Virtualized Service Function Chain Placement
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Intelligent VM Placement
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Service Placement in IoT
>>> >>
>>> >>   |
>>> >>
>>> >>   +--> Ranking Server
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> A Peer Ranking Service for P2P Streaming
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |     Information
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select CDN Surrogate
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select CDN Servers from
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |     Different SDN Domains
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select downstream CDN
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Guide the Peer Connection
>>> >>
>>> >>   |           in  Blockchain
>>> >>
>>> >>   |
>>> >>
>>> >>   +--> Network Abstraction
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Network Abstraction Provider in SDN
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Topology Abstraction for VPN Scale-out
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |     Decisions
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> ALTO being Used to Solving n2  Problem
>>> >>
>>> >>   |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |--> Information Exchanger
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     |
>>> >>
>>> >>   |     +---> Network Behaviors Exchanger between
>>> >>
>>> >>   |           Providers
>>> >>
>>> >>   |
>>> >>
>>> >>   +--> Measure Results Interface
>>> >>
>>> >>         |
>>> >>
>>> >>         +---> An Interface to Query on the LMAP
>>> >>
>>> >>               measure results
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> We attach the slides below. You can also access the editable version
>>> in Google Slides:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aXIZfUjQrSFhkVIUbvt2ouKWqLgGq4kbG-EBmSaZtKo/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Any comments or suggestions are welcomed and appreciated!
>>> >>
>>> >> Bests,
>>> >> Shawn Lin
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> alto mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > alto mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> alto mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Qiao Xiang
>> Postdoctoral Fellow,
>> Department of Computer Science,
>> Yale University
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>
>
>
> --
> --
>  =====================================
> | Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]>   |
> | Professor of Computer Science       |
> | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
>  =====================================
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to