Very well, please do file a request for agenda items once the email goes out for Vancouver. Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 7:06 AM Hans Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > perfect. I am looking forward to present in Vancouver. Among > implementation insights, we also happily share information about lessons > learned and rolling out ALTO with partners. > > I will file an agenda request for the Vancouver session once asked for on > the list. > > Thanks, > Hans > On 07.01.20 17:35, Vijay Gurbani wrote: > > Dear Hans: Thank you for your email. At this point, I am interested in > getting as much information about the implementation of the Internet-Draft > as possible in preparation for moving the work ahead in the WG. Certainly, > I will be happy to allocate you some agenda time in Vancouver to document > any lessons learned on implementing alto-sse. If you are interested, > please let me know. > > If anyone else on the list has any implementation of alto-sse, please let > me know as well. > > Thanks, > - vijay > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:26 AM Hans Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Vijay, >> >> let me answer this question for Ingmar. Currently implemented is the JSON >> merge patch feature. JSON patch is on our roadmap. We aim for a release >> that is fully compatible with the latest draft prior to the Vancouver IETF >> which I also plan to attend. Once the RFC is published, we are going to use >> SSE in production with our partners. >> >> If you or somebody on the list has an ALTO implementation and is >> interested in running tests, feel free to contact us. >> >> If you like to know more, feel free to ask. We also happily give further >> insights in our SSE implementation, or our ALTO implementation in general >> in Vancouver. If you or the list is interested in specific parts, please >> let us know and we prepare some slides for Vancouver. >> > >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
