Hi, Jan and authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics: -----邮件原件----- 发件人: alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Jan Seedorf 发送时间: 2020年11月12日 6:32 收件人: alto@ietf.org 主题: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Dear authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12, while reviewing the document, I notices the following issues with normative references: 1) [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Gredler, H., Ray, S., jefft...@gmail.com, j., Filsfils, C., and L. Ginsberg, "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm- bgp-03 (work in progress), May 2016. --> This is an RFC by now, so please fix the ref [Qin]: I think [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] has already been replaced by RFC8571 in the v-12 or earlier version. 2) [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza, "Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries", draft-ietf- ippm-initial-registry-01 (work in progress), July 2016. --> this draft is in version -016 by now, and also not a normative reference; so please update the ref and move it to informative references [Qin]: Agree, I have checked the reference, I found [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] has been quoted four times but I didn't find this reference section 9.1 or section 9.2, I think this issues should be fixed. Also IDnits should be fixed as well, https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-13.txt There are 3 nits errors which should be fixed. Can you please address these issues as well when you address the WGLC comments received (see below)? Thanks, Jan Am 08.11.20 um 22:56 schrieb Jan Seedorf: > Dear all, > > this ends the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. No > objections on this document have been raised. Three individual reviews > have been done, the respective comments have each been posted on the > ALTO mailing list by Kai (Oct 10), Denny (Oct 12), and Jensen (Oct > 13). May I kindly ask the authors of the document to address these > comments ASAP and post a new version of the document? > > Thanks, > > Jan > > Am 28.09.20 um 18:42 schrieb Jan Seedorf: >> Dear all, >> >> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving >> forward with all the remaining milestones. >> >> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for >> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, >> so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. >> >> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part >> of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the >> draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. >> >> - Vijay and Jan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
