Hi Jan, Qin, Please see below.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:43 AM Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Jan and authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: alto [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jan Seedorf > 发送时间: 2020年11月12日 6:32 > 收件人: [email protected] > 主题: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12 > > Dear authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12, > > while reviewing the document, I notices the following issues with > normative references: > > 1) [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] > Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Gredler, H., Ray, S., > [email protected], j., Filsfils, C., and L. Ginsberg, > "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering > Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm- > bgp-03 (work in progress), May 2016. > > --> This is an RFC by now, so please fix the ref > [Qin]: I think [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] has already been replaced by > RFC8571 in the v-12 or earlier version. > We no longer use this as a reference. So the issue is fixed. > > 2) [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] > Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza, > "Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries", draft-ietf- > ippm-initial-registry-01 (work in progress), July 2016. > > --> this draft is in version -016 by now, and also not a normative > reference; so please update the ref and move it to informative references > [Qin]: Agree, I have checked the reference, I found > [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] has been quoted four times but I didn't > find this reference section 9.1 or section 9.2, I think this issues should > be fixed. > Fixed. Added to informative and it looks to be the latest version -16. Further note: I fixed the issue of [RFC8571]. > Also IDnits should be fixed as well, > > https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-13.txt > There are 3 nits errors which should be fixed. > > All nits except one nit are fixed. It suggested to add an IPv6 example, and we already have IPv6 examples (e.g., Example 1). Since we added "ipv6:" prefix, the tool did not detect such examples. > Can you please address these issues as well when you address the WGLC > comments received (see below)? > > Thank you so much! Richard > Thanks, > > Jan > > Am 08.11.20 um 22:56 schrieb Jan Seedorf: > > Dear all, > > > > this ends the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. No > > objections on this document have been raised. Three individual reviews > > have been done, the respective comments have each been posted on the > > ALTO mailing list by Kai (Oct 10), Denny (Oct 12), and Jensen (Oct > > 13). May I kindly ask the authors of the document to address these > > comments ASAP and post a new version of the document? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jan > > > > Am 28.09.20 um 18:42 schrieb Jan Seedorf: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving > >> forward with all the remaining milestones. > >> > >> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for > >> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, > >> so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. > >> > >> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part > >> of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the > >> draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. > >> > >> - Vijay and Jan > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> alto mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > > > _______________________________________________ > > alto mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
