Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I concur with Francesca's DISCUSS. Please provide at least one complete sentence in Sections 3.3, 3.4, 5.4, 6.1.1.1, and 6.1.2.1. For example: There are no applicable Accept Input parameters. The "Interoperability considerations" part of Section 7.1 doesn't seem to be a complete answer to the corresponding guidance in Section 6.2 of RFC 6838. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
