Hi Kai,

I have read this document that has been discussed in the mailing list and is 
clear to optimize the mode issues, which could help to use Alto in more 
potential use cases. So I support the WGLC.

There is a question not for this document but I think might be related to it. 
This document updates the Section 6.1.2 of RFC7285. Is there any potential 
optimization possibility of Section 6.1.1 in the future? Since there is only 
the routingcost metric now. 

Regards,
Peng


[email protected]
 
From: kaigao
Date: 2022-03-25 08:46
To: alto
Subject: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
Hi all,
As discussed during the ALTO session in IETF 113, the ALTO cost mode document 
is now adopted as a working group document. A new WG version 
(draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00) [1] has been submitted to replace the individual 
draft and address comments from the Call for Adoption.
 
To move forward, this message starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00. 
The WGLC will run till April 8, 2022 (two weeks from now).
 
As both WG chairs are co-authoring the document, I’m taking care of this call 
as part of my document shepherding. We would like to have 2-3 reviewers from 
the working group. Please review and indicate your support or objection to 
proceed with the publication of this document.
 
Thanks!
 
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode/.
Best,
Kai
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to