Hi Qin, Qiao and all,
I searched for a few documents and it seems that many documents are referring
to U+002D as hyphen-minus. It seems to me that we should use hyphen-minus.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3490
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5890
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8551
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8771
Best,
Kai
-----Original Messages-----
From:"Qin Wu" <[email protected]>
Sent Time:2022-04-10 19:21:05 (Sunday)
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Qiao Xiang" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
Hi, Kai and Qiao:
Is there any other RFCs which describe “hyphen” usages besides RFC7285?
Since this work is targeted to update RFC7285, there is a time window to
improve RFC7285,
If “hyphen-minus” described in https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf, is
current best practice, I have no better reason to reject this request,:-)
The price is we should also update other sections related to cost metric and
global endpoint properties with “hyphen” usage.
-Qin
发件人: alto [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected]
发送时间: 2022年4月10日 15:57
收件人: Qiao Xiang <[email protected]>
抄送: [email protected]
主题: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
Hi Qiao and all,
Thanks for reviewing the document.
In RFC 7285, "hyphen" is used when defining PID, cost metric, etc. One option
is to use the term consistently with existing RFCs.
Best,
Kai
-----Original Messages-----
From:"Qiao Xiang" <[email protected]>
Sent Time:2022-04-09 18:04:36 (Saturday)
To:[email protected]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
Hi Kai and all,
I have read the document and support the proceeding of its publication with one
tiny suggested edit:
Section 3.2: the hyphen ('-', U+002D) -> the hyphen-minus ('-', U+002D)
This is to be consistent with the official name of this character in
https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf.
Best
Qiao
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:53 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jordi,
Thanks for reviewing the document!
Best,
Kai
-----Original Messages-----
From:"Jordi Ros Giralt" <[email protected]>
Sent Time:2022-04-08 13:03:03 (Friday)
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
Hi Kai,
I read this document and I support proceeding with its publication.
Thank you,
Jordi
From: alto <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 1:46
To:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any
links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi all,
As discussed during the ALTO session in IETF 113, the ALTO cost mode document
is now adopted as a working group document. A new WG version
(draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00) [1] has been submitted to replace the individual
draft and address comments from the Call for Adoption.
To move forward, this message starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00.
The WGLC will run till April 8, 2022 (two weeks from now).
As both WG chairs are co-authoring the document, I’m taking care of this call
as part of my document shepherding. We would like to have 2-3 reviewers from
the working group. Please review and indicate your support or objection to
proceed with the publication of this document.
Thanks!
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode/.
Best,
Kai
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
--
Qiao Xiang
Professor, Xiamen University_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
