On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 1:19 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Zahed,
>
> Please see inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> > Envoyé : jeudi 26 octobre 2023 13:12
> > À : The IESG <[email protected]>
> > Cc : [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > <[email protected]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > <[email protected]>
> > Objet : Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-15:
> > (with DISCUSS)
> >
> > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-15: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> ...
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks for working on this specification.
> >
> > It appears that this specification does not support the
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
> > tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-alto-new-
> > transport%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C83b1a7d82
> > bff4d001b0208dbd61454a5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
> > 38339155028873290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
> > V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RzITu9tHi
> > jJbSCyknPmpM1ZGAoA9aJtLqdno10in0NI%3D&reserved=0, as it only
> > defines TCP server grouping but the new transport also compatible with
> > HTTP/3
> > which would be running over QUIC. I would like to discuss why is that
> > so and if
> > there explicit reasoning behind excluding HTTP/3 why is that
> > described? It is
> > no longer the case that QUIC and HTTP/3 is work in progress.
> >
>
> [Med] The scope of this work is to set the base model that adheres to what
> is specified in the base ALTO spec (see Table 2). As discussed in Section
> 4.3, the model is designed with the intent to allow future augmentations to
> cover extensions and new features such as TIPS.


why is it scoped like this when we are also publishing the new transport at
the same time?

//Zahed


>
>
> > Also supporting Roman's discuss. It is very important that we record
> > under what
> > circumstances ALTO servers are configured to use HTTP instead of
> > HTTPS.
> >
> >
>
> [Med] Noted:
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/issues/96
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to